Skip to content
NVIDIA Research / AI-Aided Engineering
  • Research
  • Projects
  • Publications
  • Team
  • Updates

CANTO

CAD-Native Transformer Operators for AI-Aided Engineering

Predict aerodynamic fields directly from parametric CAD, then use gradients to improve the design.

Read the paper ↗ Explore the method → Authors & citation ↓

In this work

  • Native CAD geometryExact parametric surfaces
  • Continuous physical fieldsQuery predictions where needed
  • 20% lower pressure errorHiLiftAeroML · versus AB-UPT
  • Up to 20% lower dragAhmedML · matching constraints · CFD verified

Editable CAD

Use exact CAD, without meshing or sampling the input.

CANTO

Physics fields

Predict continuous fields where needed.

Better design

Refine the same CAD through its design parameters.

Gradients update CAD

The representation gap

Closing the gap between design and analysis.

Engineering designs begin as exact parametric CAD, but simulation and learned surrogates typically begin from a sampled proxy: a mesh, point cloud, or voxel grid.

Creating that proxy can be costly, brittle and labor intensive, and it separates the model used for design from the representation used for analysis. CANTO connects the CAD parameters engineers edit directly to predicted physics, so the same model can evaluate a shape and provide gradients for improving it.

Read the paper ↗
A blue nacelle surface with its defining control net, shown with the surrounding silver CAD geometry.
Control points Continuous surface
Representative NURBS surface and control net. Illustrative fit to NASA CRM geometry.

Method

How CANTO works

CANTO learns to tokenize native NURBS surfaces into a reusable geometry representation, then predicts surface and volume fields at requested locations.

01 REPRESENT
NASA CRM-HL aircraft with its CAD surface groups separated.

Read the native CAD

Each parametric surface is defined by its control points, rational weights, and knot vectors—without first sampling it into a point cloud.

02 ENCODE
P, w Control points + weights U Knot vector V Knot vector
↓ ↓ ↓
Pool Pool Pool
Concatenate + MLP
One token per patch

Encode the CAD once

CANTO turns each surface into a compact token and combines the tokens into one reusable representation of the complete geometry.

03 PREDICT
▪ ▪ ▪ ··· ▪ Geometry context
↓
Physics + field decoding
↳  Surface / volume queries
SURFACE Pressure
Wall shear
VOLUME Velocity
Vorticity

Evaluate fields where needed

Specify surface or volume query locations to evaluate the predicted fields without re-encoding the geometry.

Evaluation

Accuracy across cars and aircraft.

CANTO achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on most evaluated surface and volume tasks across four aerodynamics benchmarks, spanning automotive and aircraft geometries.

HILIFTAEROML · SURFACE PRESSURE

20 % ↘

Lower surface-pressure error

On HiLiftAeroML, CANTO reduces relative L₂ error from 5.65% to 4.53%, versus AB-UPT. Compare all four benchmarks.

See all methods in the paper ↗

Keep accuracy as spatial context shrinks.

CANTO’s surface context comes from CAD patches, so it does not depend on sampling a surface point cloud. By contrast, other methods, such as AB-UPT, converge to different solutions depending on the choice of discretization, illustrating the importance of having a neural operator.

Explore the sampling experiments ↗

Optimization and inverse design

CANTO for inverse design

On AhmedML, CANTO found designs with lower drag than the best eligible dataset designs under matching volume and lift constraints. The improvements were verified with CFD.

4–20% lower drag, validated with CFD

Results apply to the paper’s six-parameter design family. CFD evaluation confirms the lift constraint at every reported volume threshold.

AHMEDML / INVERSE DESIGN CFD VERIFIED
Drag coefficient versus volume: the CFD-verified CANTO designs lie below the best eligible existing dataset designs across the evaluated volume thresholds.
Optimized geometries are evaluated with the dataset’s CFD protocol. Sample markers use actual volume; front curves use the minimum-volume constraint. Lower drag is better. Enlarge ↗
Differentiable optimization

CAD parameters

Six bounded design variables

→

CANTO

Predict drag and lift

→

Minimize drag

Volume ≥ minimum · Lift ≤ limit

Gradients update the CAD parameters

Volume is computed directly from CAD. Final designs are verified with CFD.

Paper and authors

CAD-Native Transformer Operators for AI-Aided Engineering

NVIDIA · September 2026 · arXiv:2609.36806

Read the PDF ↗ HTML paper ↗ Cite this work ↓

AUTHORS

  1. Daniel Leibovici
  2. Nikola Borislavov Kovachki
  3. Dawon Ahn
  4. Ruben Ohana
  5. Ira J. S. Shokar
  6. Abouzar Ghasemi
  7. Semih Akkurt
  8. Rishikesh Ranade
  9. Neil Ashton
  10. Jan Kautz
  11. Jean Kossaifi
+ Citation BIBTEX
arXiv preprint · 2026
@article{leibovici2026canto,
  title = {CAD-Native Transformer Operators for AI-Aided Engineering},
  author = {Leibovici, Daniel and Kovachki, Nikola Borislavov and Ahn, Dawon and Ohana, Ruben and Shokar, Ira J. S. and Ghasemi, Abouzar and Akkurt, Semih and Ranade, Rishikesh and Ashton, Neil and Kautz, Jan and Kossaifi, Jean},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.36806},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2609.36806},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36806}
}

AI-Aided Engineering

AI-Aided Engineering is a research group within Learning and Perception Research at NVIDIA Research.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Terms of Service
  • Accessibility
  • Corporate Policies
  • Contact